🚀 What if space-time is just the scoreboard of an information game the universe has been playing since the first femtosecond?

That isn’t sci-fi clickbait; it’s the core hunch behind Informational Phase Space Cosmology (IPS)—a rapidly maturing framework that treats information (correlations, entropic flows, topological “memory”) as the real substance of reality, with the geometry of space-time merely emergent. And the latest James Webb Space Telescope deep-field data just handed IPS the sort of opening scene every paradigm shift dreams of.

🔄 JWST’s weird cosmic spin-bias

Four separate teams probing JWST deep fields report that roughly two-thirds of very-distant galaxies are spinning the same way, an alignment hard to square with an isotropic Big Bang. One group even suggests our entire observable cosmos might be the interior of an ancient, spinning black-hole-like structure—a notion that resurrects Gödel’s old rotating-universe idea and instantly explains the fresh JWST asymmetry(Live Science).

IPS predicts exactly this sort of large-scale vorticity. In its 14-dimensional information manifold, “informational vorticity” twists entanglement currents; when you project that manifold down to 3 + 1 space-time, you see rotating galaxies and preferred axes in the CMB.

✨ Why IPS is so tempting

Fewer moving parts. ΛCDM needs dark energy, dark matter, and inflation to keep the books balanced. IPS starts with just three postulates (information, correlator geometry, feedback memory) yet still generates curvature, expansion, and matter as emergent bookkeeping—not bespoke patches.
Built-in fixes for the Hubble tension. Because our 3-D slice can re-slice the information manifold over time, the locally-measured H₀ will drift relative to early-epoch inferences—precisely what astronomers observe.
Natural dark-energy analogue. Accelerated expansion shows up as entropic “pressure” from unfolding informational degrees of freedom, not a mysterious fluid.
Cosmic memory. IPS sectors act like neural-network attractors; the universe literally remembers past topological states, giving a concrete path for cosmic feedback and self-tuning.

**🔬 How do we test it—now?**

🧩 Where the community can jump in

Data hackers – scrape JWST rotation catalogs; look for redshift-dependent drift in the spin-bias amplitude.
Q-lab folks – emulate the 3-qubit “Pauli-curvature” toy model; compare emergent metric with IPS analytic form (Appendix B of the preprint).
CMB statisticians – re-analyze low-ℓ Planck maps with an informational vorticity template instead of a simple dipole.
Philosophy-of-science nerds – debate whether IPS’s “universe that learns itself” ontology rescues Wheeler’s It-from-Bit without invoking panpsychism.

🎯 TL;DR

JWST just lobbed a spinning curveball at standard cosmology. IPS not only expects that curveball, it catches it with one hand while tidying up the Hubble tension and dark-energy fuss. Better yet, we can start shooting at the theory right now with telescopes, interferometers, and quantum chips already humming.

Whether IPS survives those shots or not, the next few years are going to be ridiculously fun—for astronomers, quantum engineers, and anyone who thinks reality might be written in the language of information itself.

Grab popcorn. The data deluge has only begun.

Want to know more? Informational Phase Space Cosmology: A Geometric Framework for Entanglement, Curvature, and Memory Dynamics

Gödelian Phases of Time: Emergent Rotation and Dimensionality from Quantum Temporal Correlations

Permissibility of Dodecahedral Geometry in Informational Phase Space Cosmology

Informational Phase Space Cosmology: Axiomatized and Expanded

Informational Phase Space Cosmology and the Ontologyof Consciousness: Four Interpretive Models Compared

Frame-Embedded Informational Holonomy as a Substrate for Qualia: Formalism, Simulation, and Predictions

Classification and Determination of Topological Knots in Informational Phase Space Cosmology

BLIND SΩPHIST