According Mind Map

Summary

1. Modern Warfare is Hybrid Warfare

• The absence of a direct World War III or large-scale conflict between the U.S. and Iran is due to hybrid warfare, where most battles are fought through:

  • Information control (media narratives)

  • Cyber warfare

  • Psychological operations (weakening public resolve)

  • Covert ops & economic sabotage (sanctions, assassinations, infrastructure attacks)

• The U.S. and Israel aim for regime change in Iran by undermining its legitimacy (e.g., exacerbating water shortages to create famine/drought).

• Paradoxically, such sabotage may strengthen Iranian resistance, potentially leading to Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz, forcing a U.S. ground invasion—which the U.S. would likely lose.

2. Eschatology Drives Geopolitics

The core thesis: Religious and ideological end-time beliefs (eschatologies) shape global conflicts.

Why Eschatologies Are Powerful:

• They answer fundamental human questions: Where do we come from? What is our purpose? Where are we going?

• They act as "scripts" that enable unconscious coordination among believers, making them more effective than conspiracies (which rely on secrecy and trust).

• They align with self-interest—participating in an eschatology can bring wealth, power, and purpose.

Major Eschatological Traditions & Their Convergence:

1. Zoroastrianism (Good vs. Evil final battle → influenced Judaism).

2. Judaic Tradition – A Messiah will lead Jews to victory, rebuild the Third Temple, and usher in peace.

3. Christian Zionism (Protestant) – Jesus’ Second Coming requires:

   • Israel’s restoration (1948)

   • Third Temple construction

   • War of Gog & Magog (Armageddon)

   • The Antichrist’s rise

4. Islamic Tradition – A leader (Mahdi) will emerge to unify Muslims against the Antichrist (Dajjal).

5. Orthodox (Russian) Tradition – Moscow as the "Third Rome" must restore the Byzantine Empire under Putin (seen as the "Katechon"—restrainer of the Antichrist).

   • Alexander Dugin’s Plan:

     • Unify Eurasia (Berlin-Moscow-Tokyo-Tehran axis) to counter Anglo-American naval dominance.

     • Exploit internal divisions in the U.S./UK (Brexit, Trump, immigration).

     • Weaken China (ecological collapse, economic dependency).

6. Catholic Tradition – The Church seeks to reclaim global dominance by:

   • Undermining the Anglo-American Empire (Protestant rival).

   • Destroying the nation-state system (post-French Revolution).

   • Reversing modernity (materialism, secularism).

   • Signs of Catholic Resurgence:

     • JD Vance (U.S. VP) as a Catholic convert.

     • Pope’s influence in U.S. institutions (6/9 Supreme Court justices Catholic).

     • CIA-Vatican historical ties ("Catholics in Action").

     • Demographic shift (immigration boosting Catholic numbers).

Key Convergence Points Among Eschatologies:

• A major Middle East war (WWIII) involving Israel, Russia, and Islamic forces.

• America absent (due to failed Iran war or civil war).

• China collapses (ecological/food crises).

• Antichrist emerges (charismatic unifier).

• Israel dominates Middle East, builds Third Temple (destroys Dome of the Rock).

• Global anti-Semitism drives Jews to Israel.

• Age of Tribulation (chaos, deception, suffering before final redemption).

3. Predicted Future Geopolitical Scenario (Next 10-20 Years)

1. U.S. invades Iran → fails → retreats → triggers American civil war.

2. Russia defeats NATO in Ukraine → Europe turns pro-Russian.

3. Turkey collapses → Greeks reclaim Constantinople (Byzantine revival).

4. U.S. exits Middle East → Israel becomes regional empire → builds Third Temple → Islamic world revolts.

5. Putin unites Orthodox & Islamic worlds → seen as "Katechon" (restrainer of chaos).

6. Global instability → rise of Antichrist → tribulation era (famine, war, suffering).

Why the Anglo-American Empire Doesn’t Counter This:

• Baby Boomer elites prioritize short-term comfort over long-term strategy.

• Western decline is inevitable due to lack of strategic vision.

Final Conclusion: Eschatology Shapes History

• Geopolitical events align with religious prophecies, proving eschatology’s influence.

• The world is heading toward a period of extreme conflict and realignment, driven by competing end-time beliefs.

• The next video will explore how Baby Boomer leadership accelerates Western decline.

There's been quite a bit of talk recently online about the idea that a certain group of people holds power at the global level, controlling International financial institutions, major media outlets, universities. They censor dissident opinions, especially when those opinions, point out the nepotistic behavior of this kind of parasitical ruling elite. And these people are not a force for good in the world. That's the idea that people are talking about, and I think there's something to this. But I don't believe that the global ruling elite maps neatly onto any existing religious or ethnic identity. Not that there is no ethnic basis to the global ruling elite—I do think that bloodlines are extremely important to the people that rule the world and the meaningful players, I kind of surmise and conjecture, do trace their bloodlines back to some original identity that has held power at a global level for thousands of years. From the beginning of the Neolithic, perhaps deeper in the past than that.

That is not that much of a stretch if you trace the spread of the genetics out of the near East with the Neolithic Revolution. There is a massive disparity in wealth in those societies. An elite, a kind of semi-divine Anunnaki priesthood group, was monopolizing mating resources, physical resources. I think they had slave colonies; they engaged in human sacrifice. These people spread their influence and their way of life and their systems of domination around the world, and they went with their systems.

So where Neolithic technology spread, the elite bloodlines spread. Of course, there was, in my opinion, an original ethnic type that created this control system in the early Neolithic. When it spreads, however, there's a lot of mixing with indigenous peoples. It's not going to have a huge genetic signature—although you do see that, you know, the spread of these ancient near Eastern uh haplotypes and autosomal markers and such. They go all over the world. You know, there's been a massive kind of endemic diffusion from that Hub, coupled with not just Neolithic technology but the system of control that went with Neolithic technology.

In some areas, that control stayed very, very tight. In other areas, I think that control waned as it went East into the Harappan civilization. Ultimately, you had huge centralization of resources—uh, the cities were centrally planned, control of water was, you know, necessarily because it's an arid environment in Pakistan and Northwest India. That was controlled by the government ostensibly. As it moved South into the Levant, Egypt, that tight control of these ancient ruling bloodlines continued. As it went North, it resulted in a culture that had a huge degree of freedom.

So you had, as you go into the caucuses, the spread of Neolithic technology. You have like the laylee tepi culture, which is the first bronze smithing in the world. You have the Maykop culture, the Kura-Araxes culture. In these cultures, you get the first cultivation of wine, swords, column architecture—a lot of the stuff that we think of as like classical features actually comes from the south caucasus region from 6000 BC to around 3000 BC.

3000 BC, you have the Maykop culture. This is a super advanced culture for its time, probably still basically under the sphere of this Neolithic control system. These are psycho technologies employed by ruling elites to maintain order. We think of it as simply like Civilization, and it's normal, and this, you know, we don't think about it twice. The reality though is that people didn't used to live this way, and it started at a particular point in time with particular bloodlines driving it.

So, in any case, as the Kaykop culture interacted with step nomads and farmers, they weren't able to keep control, and you had a kind of franchise model of political sovereignty driven by the force wielded by individual bands of warriors on horseback. That's where things kind of got out of their hands. The Indo-European expansion, I think, is a result of the legal technologies, the kind of Technologies of mind control invented in the near Eastern sphere that spread into groups occupying the step. And they used this system, and it evolved in a bunch of different directions with Indo-European expansions.

That's not the only place I think the ancient Neolithic elite lost control, but you do see their genetic signatures in the caucus hunter-gatherers that went North. So again, elite bloodlines I think are transmitted even with Indo-European groups from that ancient Neolithic elite.

As you go west across Anatolia, I've pointed to certain sites like Aşıklı Höyük, which, based on like patterns of age at burial and sex ratios and the layout of the settlements, I took to be work camps. And then you look at the first city out there, Çatalhöyük—population around 7000—they use the same basic architectural techniques as what I took to be like work camps like Aşıklı Höyük. So I think what happened is there was a worker's revolt among this population of Anatolian hunter-gatherers, and those are the genetics that primarily went West into Greece, beginning the European Neolithic, and then spread with, you know, early European farmer genetic markers across continental Europe.

So there, there was also a spread of those ancient Neolithic bloodlines. It's interesting that the modern populations that most closely resemble early European farmers are Sardinians and Ashkenazi Jews. But they wouldn't have been that similar to the original population that started the Neolithic.

Now, of course, many people have speculated about the identity of the people who built Gobekli Tepe. I'm not going to go into all the evidence there. I am basically in line with Graham Hancock's thesis. Other people have pointed to these out-of-place artifacts like the Baalbek megaliths or, you know, some stuff from Egypt seems to be of a much earlier date. You can dismiss this if you want, but you know, look at Graham Hancock's work. I would basically just kind of piggyback off of what he has pointed to.

And yeah, it doesn't make sense that Gobekli Tepe is the largest megalithic structure Intel around 5000 BC—so 9500 BC, Gobekli Tepe is built, or maybe even earlier. It's the largest, most sophisticated structure for the next five thousand years, and it's supposed to be the first that hunter-gatherers built. Supposedly built by hunter-gatherers? Also, the earliest layers of Gobekli Tepe are larger and more sophisticated artistically than later layers. So if they're learning how to do this, they shouldn't be the best at it right when they start. That doesn't make sense.

Gobekli Tepe looks to me like some group arrived in the near East from somewhere and worked with local natufian populations and took in a lot of their genetics too, as well as taking in genetics from caucus hunter-gatherers and Anatolian hunter-gatherers. And as they spread east, of course, Neolithic Iranians. But in the case, some group showed up and built Gobekli Tepe because they already knew how.

Also, it's not just a megalithic work—there's Terrazzo, which is an early form of cement. This is right after the younger dryas, which is a dramatic and sudden shift in the earth temperature from 10,800 BC to 9500 BC. Right at the end of that, all of a sudden, people are making concrete and sophisticated megaliths with 3D sculptures built onto them. It doesn't add up, basically.

Of course, 9500 BC is also precisely the date that Plato gives for the destruction of Atlantis. I do think Plato was right in a number of respects. Plato seems to have like an eerie knowledge of prehistory. You know, correctly assessing that like the Greek language evolved out of more primitive languages that were similar to barbarians to the north. His suggestions about Eugenics or controlled uh reproductive systems that looks in a certain way very similar to what happened at Chateau Hayek.

People don't realize—the first city in the world, what I interpret to be this first Breakaway of a slave class—they traded children. From Dental evidence, from genetic evidence, the nuclear families, the households were not genetically related to each other entirely. They apparently, at least, swapped children, which is interesting. That doesn't vindicate that like this was a guardian Society, but Plato does say in the Timaeus, in the voice of Socrates, that this model of the Republic from the Republic is actually the way of governing of ancient Athens—the Athens that was around when Atlantis was around. And of course, the Athenians, according to Plato, defeated the atlanteans, uh, and you know, and then the natural disasters struck and all of that.

So Plato has a weirdly accurate knowledge of the early Neolithic, and there's no way to account for that. Also, he has the most sophisticated philosophical system in human history, and people still, you know, find that his solutions to many problems are better than any existing solution. Many of the smartest people in history have been platonists—you know, Leibniz was a platonist, Bertrand Russell in a certain respect a platonist, Whitehead is a kind of platonist—like massively influential. And you could say that's because Plato is just really smart, or he was tapping into Traditions that have a lot more weight behind them.

So that is kind of just starting with the Neolithic and the spread of civilization as we know it to show that the technologies that allow for massive population control showed up at a certain point in time in human history and spread with certain genetic markers. No ethnic type from those days exists, but there are certain genetic markers that are more common in Elites that do have their origin—or at least they show up for the first time in that region at that time.

Couple this with the model by Julian James, The Bicameral Mind. What he says there is that with the Neolithic, you had a new kind of mentality where people began to like interiorize the voice of the village Chief. When the Chief died, they were—and this is ubiquitous across many Neolithic sites—when the Chief died, he would be kind of partially interred. They would display him for a time to kind of feed him as if he was still alive. The bones would be interred so they're accessible. And Jane's hypothesis is that people actually continued to hear somehow the voice of the village Chief, and this was a necessary adaptation to life at higher than Dunbar's unit scales.

So when you had Villages of one thousand, two thousand plus, this bicameral mind feature allowed a greater integration because everybody constructed a kind of similar internal voice of the chief that developed into an internal voice of the gods. And so this is why like all ancient culture is pretty much used Idols. In James's opinion, these Idols were ways of kind of Awakening these auditory hallucinations. He points to neurological evidence even that there is a kind of corresponding region in the right hemisphere to the speech centers in the left hemisphere, and if you stimulate those regions in the right hemisphere, you do trigger auditory hallucinations.

So this is why it's a bicameral mind. There is the right hemisphere voice, which was like the voice of the Gods, voice of you know the village Chief originally, he says. And then left hemisphere—like my own personal inner narrative. Bicameral societies, uh, Jane says, were adaptive up until the giant settlements of early Sumer—someone who had like 20,000 plus citizens. The old bicameral psychotechnology of control didn't work.

I've speculated that this was not some you know darwinian selection pressure that led to this internalization—like thought, literal thought control didn't evolve spontaneously. It was a technology, a psychic technology that was used by the people who started the Neolithic, the same Gobekli Tepe priest cast.

Couple that with speculations on the nature of the Atlantean technology, and there's a whole literature on it—uh, you can go in a lot of different directions with it. But the general consensus that you're going to find is that they used some kind of sound-based technology. And you can go into like how certain megalithic structures encode proportions inherent to the Earth, and if they were meant to resonate with the Earth's native like resting frequency, then that would make sense. And they would be on at certain locations around the earth to act as a network.

Uh, you can look into like Ley lines. People doubt these things, of course, but there are some weird facts about the positioning of megalithic structures around the world and the way that they kind of geodetically encode information—in addition to the astronomical correlations that have been noted for decades in the pyramids or Stonehenge or these sorts of things.

There were some sound-based component, potentially. Another component was PSI Technologies—you know, paranormal abilities. And the best person to look to for this is really, at this point in time, Rupert Sheldrake. He has collected more studies and shown more evidence about telepathy, telekinesis than many others. You know, people who often dismiss this.

And I would say that the global ruling Elite have always known what technologies to suppress, what not to allow. You know, like Tesla's idea of harvesting energy from the earth looks very much like what many people believe the ancient megalithic Builders were doing. So they've always known what technology is to suppress, they would suppress, and they have suppressed.

Platonism as a philosophical system in recent times—the only time that platonism was openly accepted and embraced was a period of time where European civilization was independent of other influences from outside of their spirit. And once International—this kind of international type, uh, you know, Venetian Bankers, other identity groups—gained power in Europe, then platonism was once again suppressed. It was suppressed during the medieval period.

You know, what does Plato say in the story of Atlantis? He says that the Greeks are always forgetting their past because of these Perpetual disasters. If you were an ancient ruling Elite and you wanted to maintain control, and you started with these Advanced Technologies that other peoples did not possess, then it would behoove you to occasionally instigate cataclysms—or at least take advantage of cataclysms and be prepared for them yourself—to wipe away the memory of mankind.

That happened with the Bronze Age collapse. That happened at the beginning of the Bronze Age, even wiping out memories from a pre-Bronze Age civilizational period. So yeah, the same thing kind of happened with late Antiquity. And you know, it was a well—the Muslim expansions, I think we shouldn't underestimate the organizational principles behind that. Also like there is really interesting evidence about the nature of Islam itself—whether Muhammad was even a historical figure, was it actually an early branch of Christianity? There's a whole set of conspiracy theories you can get into with the origins of Islam. Or perhaps that was a certain psycho technology brought about by the same ruling Elite, used to kind of wipe the Slate clean on late antique knowledge, which became very, very sophisticated.

I mean, what were the late neoplatonists working with? They were engaging in theoretic practices. So there's three dimensions then to this ancient hypothetical technology: sound-based aspect (resonant frequencies), solubility facet, and there's also then Theory or God working—you know, making contact with higher entities.

I have said that I think the global ruling Elite are in cahoots with a certain very powerful spiritual entity, and that spiritual entity wants to suppress the ability of other spiritual entities to act on this plane. I'll just leave that, you know, where it lies.

But okay, to really understand why that would be the case, I think we have to go back to Neanderthal times. You have two competing strategies of cognition. 200,000 years ago in the Neanderthal World, they built very consistent and very sophisticated Technologies. They had artificial adhesives to attach, you know, their spear tips. They built boats. The artifacts that neanderthals made are very difficult or impossible for modern archaeologists to replicate. It's easy to replicate Homo sapiens Technologies; it's very hard to replicate Neanderthal Technologies.

And so I don't know if neanderthals themselves had any Psy ability stuff going on or sound-based technology stuff, but they did have larger cerebellums proportionally. The homo sapien strategy is more emphasizing cerebral activity—the cerebrum is more active when you're in reasoning processes; the cerebellum is more active when you're dreaming, in Mystic States. Homo sapiens Technologies varied at a much higher rate, so there's a lot more change. And Homo sapiens also existed in much larger social groups.

Now, apply this dichotomy to platonism and what Plato says about the nature of the psyche. So there is, in the divided line from the Republic, four epistemological faculties that we're dealing with. The shortest on the line and the least significant—most untrustworthy, but like best known to us in a certain respect—is the faculty of ikasia, which is like the Imaging faculty. That's what you get with sensation qua sensation—sensation as sensation itself appears through the Imaging faculty at ikasia.

Above that, you have doxa or pistis—opinion. And that's like when we apply an idea of what is causing the sense perception, so we're making claims about what exists and what does not exist. But that isn't sophisticated until you get to mathematical reasoning—dianoia—above the level of doxa or pistis. Not just conjecture, but you're making contact with the logoi of the Soul itself. These mathematical laws, logical laws, are in us intrinsically; we have access to them. And this is the level at which Homo sapiens excels.

Above that, the most significant is intellect qua intellect—the intuitive faculty that we use to ascertain the nature of the forms. This is what mathematicians use when they are formulating axioms for a theory. You can't prove the axioms of a theory mathematically using mathematical reasoning; it has to come from something underneath the level of, you know, an algorithm. No algorithm can generate the Axiom that it's based on, so you need something higher than that to get things off the ground. Also, you need something higher than that to access the forms themselves—like the true types in reality.

So perhaps the Neanderthal brain structure was better suited to intuit these forms in a very deep sense. That's why it's hard for us to replicate the tools they had. Smaller social groups because they didn't emphasize dianoetic discursive reason as much. They dealt perhaps more with like an immediate apprehension of musical tones. People have speculated that perhaps Neanderthals primarily sang rather than spoke—you know, I don't know about that for sure, but it's interesting nonetheless.

So you have these two different strategies. The homo sapiens Network—scalably, they operate as a kind of hive mind. And I think that these two groups converged um a few times in history—in northwest Africa, leading to the genetic stock that eventually led to like the Iberia marusian culture. This is a quite sophisticated culture for the time.

It happened contact happened in Egypt—uh, apparently. I've I've read that there were neanderthals in Egypt 70,000 BC. We can you know try to confirm that; I have not been able to confirm what this professor that I was listening to said about that. But in any case, they also converged in the Levant. And in these places, you got—minus Egypt because we don't think we know all that much about Egypt 100,000 years ago—but there were sophisticated cultures in the Levant, in northwest Africa around 110,000 years ago, the Eemian interglacial period.

So it got kind of warm; there were admix events; sophisticated populations cropped up. Whether these sophisticated populations continued in operation and maintained a degree of like networked power as this like Master race over others—uh, is anybody's guess. And perhaps they disappear; perhaps they don't; perhaps they move somewhere.

Neanderthals had boats at that time. We know that neanderthals themselves were on uh Crete a hundred and some odd thousand years ago. It's entirely possible that they did make it to the Azores Islands. Perhaps at a certain point in time, it was a much larger Island. Randall Carlson goes into a lot of evidence supporting that—he's with me on the whole the Azores Islands is Atlantis hypothesis.

In any case, these groups mixed. Perhaps there was Advanced activity in the background. They also mixed in south-east Europe—uh, I've preferred the idea that perhaps the Carpathian Sphinx, which is uh—well, you can watch my uh Atlantean hypothesis video from like way back. I'll try to link it if I can, or I'll leave a link in the description to that video.

But uh, the Carpathian Sphinx is a natural rock formation that was clearly influenced by humans touching it over a very long period of time. It's a high mountain valley with a bunch of caves that have great Acoustics and a bunch of natural kind of platforms for performance. If they had a sound-based technology, caves are going to be very important stages; natural stages will be very important. And the Sphinx is just a really neat rock formation that would have drawn a lot of you know curious neanderthals or early admix specimens.

Some of the earliest at confirmed admix specimens are found relatively close by to the Sphinx. Also, that area in the Carpathian Mountains—Romania, Bulgaria—is where a lot of the major cultures of the upper Paleolithic emanated from, like the gravetian culture. So I think something Advanced was going on there. I think there was a kind of Carpathian Sphinx cult that led to a different way of thinking. And maybe this was a more advanced group of Neanderthal-slash-admix Homo sapiens—very large brains, sound-based technology, maybe the psy abilities, maybe even theoretic practices at that time. Who knows?

I think ultimately the solutreans—we don't have solutrean DNA; we don't know for sure where they came from—but I think they probably will have emanated from this Carpathian Sphinx region. And they were one of the most sophisticated cultures—probably the most sophisticated culture of their time. I am on board with the solutrean hypothesis. Watch the lectures from the late Dennis Stanford; they are very compelling. People will dismiss this based on Wikipedia articles and cursory readings, but the resemblances are striking and very clearly evident in the archaeological record.

There were transatlantic migrations, so uh that would have put them—I mean, they probably would have been hopping around the ice sheet, but some solutrean people may have made it to the Azores. If not, you know, much earlier groups from North Africa or the Levant. So there are several more advanced groups that may—I mean, I don't know that we know the solutreans had boats, but they likely did have boats. The earliest Norwegian cultures did have boats; we know that.

I think people converged—Advanced groups converged in the Azores Islands. And in an island context, you do see an amplification of intense hierarchies for obvious reasons. I think you would see a Perfection of psychic abilities of control. And so I think this is where this stuff developed—in the warming period between 17,000 BC and 12,000 BC. That's where the really advanced stuff would have happened—would have happened in the Azores Islands.

And probably nearby sites will be found in northwest Africa. Maybe the eye of the Sahara is related to that. I think more advanced stuff will be found—although I mean, have you looked at the artwork from this solutrean period, early magdalenian period, from the Franco-Cantabrian region? Not just the paintings, but the rock art, the carvings—they're extremely sophisticated. So if some of these people made it to the Azores, they're expert sculptors, and they have more of that Neanderthal cerebellum—you know, Mystic intuitive way of—we can't imagine how they thought. They had different brains and much larger brains than modern people.

So the idea that, you know, if we can measure marginally some sensitivity to solubilities in modern-day humans, perhaps you know that ability could have been greatly Amplified if that was the main way that these people survived—perhaps. Or maybe it allowed them to climb to the top of hierarchies and breed more successfully.

So I think this develops in the Azores Islands. And I do buy the younger dryas comet hypothesis—or comets plural. I think the younger dryas was began and probably ended by comet impacts that were devastating. I think the Azores Islands would have been the worst-hit place on Earth. You know, North America was devastated; some of Western Europe was devastated. The Azores Islands would have been like Ground Zero of the devastation.

One of the most hospitable places during the younger dryas was the near East. So where were they going to go? They would have gone into North Africa—and we haven't explored the Sahara; it used to be green. It's very probable that there's a lot of post-Atlantean stuff from the Sahara desert. But one place they would have gone—where there were relatively large population centers that they could have interacted with, you know, took advantage of—was the near East. So I think that's who started Gobekli Tepe.

So they had—probably that group had much higher Neanderthal admixture. They had these abilities. As they diluted, though, their direct bloodline descendants—like of the Gobekli Tepe priest caste, the ruling Elite—their bloodline descendants would have gradually gotten lower and lower Neanderthal admixture.

The Atlantean group—the original type—I think the closest analog will be solutrean DNA, if we ever get it. Whatever that turns out to be, and it might surprise us. Right, the ruling Bloodlines are kind of diffused out through time. They lose these abilities that they used to have; they lose this Advantage—the ruling technology of mind control that they employed. They lose that ability.

Also, Isaac Asimov is an interesting science fiction writer and possible globalist Insider, and uh he brings in like these psycho Technologies of control in his Foundation series—just a cross-reference for you.

So the ruling bloodline was stuff used—that's why later on, like Egyptian pharaohs started marrying siblings. You know, the Bronze Age Elite all intermarried and tried to maintain the Bloodlines of these royal families because they were losing it. Technologies originated in more of this Mystic intellect faculty of the more Neanderthal atlanteans. They start to go back to use these Technologies; they know the Technologies. The Technologies are socially transmitted within their network, but gradually they shift in their cognitive style.

The direct descendants of Gobekli Tepe—they shift into this Homo sapiens dianoetic discursive mode. But that allows their Technologies to be transmitted without any individual mastering it. It used to be that everyone had to have—I hypothesize—like more of an intuitive direct knowledge of this sound technology or psychic technology or whatever it was. Later, post-Gobekli Tepe, as they became more Homo sapiens and less Neanderthal, they kind of distributed that knowledge in a resilient Network, developed new social technologies that were more based on that kind of mind control—dianoetic mind control rather than intellectual mind control, you could say.

And that's why the existing Elite are not the closest relatives in a certain sense from the atlanteans themselves—although they will be more the direct bloodline descendants, at least along a certain line. So they will know what technologies to censor, even if they cannot themselves employ these Technologies. And it would be incumbent on them to especially prevent a certain group of people from accessing these Technologies—the group of people that are most closely related to the atlanteans. And that would be Europeans.

The global Elite knew which Technologies to suppress. They had—they maintained, at a social level, memory of many Technologies, but they themselves didn't have intuitive access to the forms. And that's something that comes with that different brain structure, different uh spiritual makeup.

So in that way, I see platonism and pythagoreanism as a kind of resynthesis and Gathering of ancient Technologies. This is what the Ancients said about Pythagoras himself, about Plato himself—they went and visited the Chaldean priesthood, Egyptian priesthood, zoroastrians—the ruling Elite esoteric Bloodlines in all these places. This was transmitted to these philosophers.

And this system, I think, is going to be especially vital for the close relatives of the original atlanteans to ReDiscover some of these Technologies themselves and actually put it into use. So that's uh the relevance of platonism in all of this. It is rediscovering the ways that more Neanderthal types can Network intelligently and work together—not in the same kind of networks as more Homo sapiens groups and the global Elite themselves use, but a higher kind of networking.

That's what the platonic dialectic is for. It is for harmonizing thinking at a much deeper level. It's not, you know, setting everyone into order by the same algorithmic processes, but uniting on the same intuitions of the forms.

These are the two strategies. The one is going to be replicated with artificial intelligence—that and they bear the signature of their father. Right, this group—the Breakaway atlanteans. I mean, the atlanteans are already characterized as the bad guys in Plato's Timaeus. So these people were Fallen. This is what the mystics who talk about Atlantis all agree with—the atlanteans had fallen in a certain respect. They made contact with the wrong Spirit; they became influenced right by the wrong spirit.

That Spirit has been using them over the ages, eroding their character, making them uh less competent individually, but strengthening their Network. And he partially inhabits their social network—their grid of control, the Beast system. And he will finally incarnate in full form when AGI is developed, using that kind of dianoetic level of consciousness.

The alternative to that is a way of allowing the intellect and intuition to be harmonized in a group of people so that we access these abilities again. Like, that is one problem with people who believe more strongly in intuition—it's harder to like get them into thought control because they have such uh close access to the forms themselves. But that means they can be very fractious, and they don't listen to one another.

And this is what you see with Germanic peoples throughout history. You don't have one big unified Germanic Empire; never have; it never took off because uh it's just in our character. We trust too much in ourselves because we have this really strong connection to reality in a way that is hard to explain. Like, look at some of the early like steam engine Machinery or like 19th-century machine components. This stuff—literally, inventors and Engineers just understood at a very deep level without advanced equations telling them what to do. They like grasp the nature of these things. That's how Tesla describes his process of invention.

Obviously, you can achieve quite a bit. But unless you can bring those intuitions into a Harmony by a method, then it's just a bunch of you know atomized people, and you cannot melt in opposition to this other Force.

That's how I read history at a certain level. It's a clash not only between good and evil but two different cognitive strategies. And if you want the one to win out that emphasizes intellectual intuition—right, grasping of the highest level aspects of reality, making contact with benevolent Spirits, unlocking latent human potential, finding a human future—if you want that, then platonism is the way to go. That's how you will find your way back.

That's what I have to say. A lot of this was speculative; maybe some of it sounded crazy. I hope you guys enjoyed. Let me know what you think in the comments. Any aspects of this theory that seem convergent with other theories, let me know. Other data you think I should look at, let me know. Thanks, guys. God bless.

The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe or CTMU (pronounced "cat-mew") is the first self-simulation theory of the relationship between mind and reality by Christopher Michael Langan.

The universe is a Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language (Chris Langan)

The Author = The Universe

The CTMU saves us from many conundrums that stem from the idea that reality was a tangible thing that had one specific, outside creator.

Materialist smooth brains like to argue that if God created the universe then who created God? This is self-inflicted mental retardation reeking with ignorance. A chosen misunderstanding, usually introduced with the words “Oh, so you’re saying…“.

No, that’s not what I’m saying.

If reality is defined as everything there is, it would indeed be tricky to define the creator of that as being something outside. Materialists find their whole identity in repeatedly projecting this misunderstanding onto anyone dumb enough to try to help them.

Let me help you.

The universe is both the author and the book. It is a story writing itself. You may not like this definition but don’t confuse your thinking it is trivial with thinking it is incorrect. Accept this thought and go with it.

The biggest issue with all kinds of simulation theories is, that they require some sort of framework that runs the simulation. If reality is a computer simulation then what computer is it running on? This line of thinking forces you into the next layer of abstraction where now you have to explain how the computer that simulates reality is itself being simulated. You’re stuck with the same question in another dimension.

Well, what computer is the simulation running on that simulates the computer that runs the simulation?

It’s dumb and I shouldn’t have to point that out. This is what Chris calls:

Metaphysical Autology: Reality is self-contained; no external creator needed

God didn’t make the pudding, God is in the pudding.

The CTMU rejects the idea of a simulation and says

The universe is not a simulation, it is a syntactic-semantic unity.

So in other words a self-simulation, and we may just say that the universe is both singular ("author") and plural ("content") which Chris calls Multiplex Unity.

It means same, same but different and you can imagine it like a fractal. The same fractal produces different shapes and colors depending on what you look at and how deep you zoom into it but it never stops being the same thing, no matter how deep you go.

In terms of quantum soup, the universe is a single broth (unity) that becomes distinct flavors (multiplexity) when "observed". The same soup that you find dull might be too salty for your grandma. The same vegetable that you find overcooked might be undercooked for somebody else.

The CTMU terminology for the quantum soup is unbound telesis. A state of infinite potential.

UBT (unbound telesis) is the broth, observation adds the ‘flavors’ of reality.

Now just imagine the broth preparing itself and you have the perfect analogy.

The Language = Math + Logic

We’ve covered the author and the book but what is the language that is written? Quite simply, it is math and logic itself. They are a set of rules by which its construction and manipulation is being guided, just like grammar is guiding the flow of natural language.

Reality is a syntactic-semantic language where mathematics and logic are the irreducible grammar. Syntax (math/logic) generates semantics (meaning).

Though maybe hard to wrap your head around at first, let me throw in a funny little fact to meditate on.

The GNU compiler collection (gcc) that is used to compile most C and C++ programs is itself written in C. How does that make you feel? It tickles your brain for a moment and then you move on. Now what’s so hard to accept about the idea that reality is a language that is using math and logic to compile itself while it’s running?

It is self-creating and self-processing.

The observable laws of physics are what Langan calls Syntactic Operators. The fact that a sentence has a subject and object is not something that we somehow discovered. It’s just how grammar works. Similarly, the number π is not discovered, it just is what it is. Math isn’t invented, it’s the universe’s grammar.

Particles are ‘words’; forces are ‘verbs’. (CTMU Glossary)

Materialists think math is a tool, as if a monkey with a wrench could build the universe. Math is not a tool but the mere bones of the universe. The universe was running on math before humans even existed. The same can’t be said about the wrench.

The Plot = Evolution

“Reality evolves via telic recursion, a self-configuring process where syntactic states refine toward coherence.” (Langan, CTMU Overview)

Telic means towards a goal, so the opposite of random. Let’s take a moment of silence for all the materialists whose buttocks just clenched when they read this.

So even though this whole play is far from being deterministic, it is indeed loosely following a certain script, which Langan calls syntactic attractor. It doesn’t exactly know it’s own next step but it kind of knows where it wants to go. It seeks coherence and it finds itself in a constant state of debugging. Mistakes are allowed but they will be corrected.

Pretty much the same loop you find yourself in throughout your own life but on a greater scale. Like you grow as a person through seeking coherence, the universe grows as a whole.

Evolution is the process of attaining coherence and the goal of that process is to get closer to God. The universe is fulfilling its destiny and in the process, you are fulfilling yours.

You co-author this story called your life but only so far as you align with your own destiny. The more you deviate from it, the more you will be forced to walk back. Every step you take will ultimately bring you closer to your destiny, no matter which direction you chose.

"Reality is a error-correcting code. Telic recursion is its debugger."

How it works:

• Step 1: A syntactic state (e.g., a physical law) generates potential outcomes.

• Step 2: Incoherent outcomes (paradoxes/contradictions) are automatically pruned.

• Step 3: Surviving states feed back into the system as new "rules."

And so the plot keeps evolving while biological evolution is just another symptom of telic recursion in the biosphere.

But what is the ink that brings all of this onto paper? What are paper, ink, and reality actually made of?

You’ve guessed it. It is consciousness itself. Reality is a love letter written to itself.

"Semantic content (meaning) requires a syntactic medium (physics), just as ink requires paper—but in SCSPL, the ink and paper are mutually generative." (CTMU Glossary)

Consciousness isn’t just the ink, it’s the paper becoming the ink writing itself. It is how the universe perceives itself.

M=R (Mind=Reality)

In the CTMU there is no distinguishing between mind and reality. They are codependent and can be seen as two different angles of looking at the same thing.

"Mind and reality are not just correlated but identical. Perception is reality’s self-reading mechanism." (CTMU, 2002)

This means that mind (cognition) is not just an observer of the universe (reality) around it but an active participant in creating reality.

Your consciousness isn't observing reality, it's reality locating itself. Mind is reality’s self-locating GPS, where “You are here” creates here.

"The universe is a self-excited circuit where observation and existence coincide." (Langan, 2017)

You might think this is far-fetched, but it is actually one of the major claims of quantum mechanics and has been proven in the double-slit experiment. The double-slit experiment isn't just "spooky action", it is conspansive duality in action

If you’ve never heard of it, look it up and give it a quick read. It’s an experiment with a truly unpredictable result that can be interpreted as proof for free will, as it implies particles choose paths. Observation creates position (M=R)

Since we’re doing the top-down abstract modeling kind of thing here, we don’t really care about proof or experiments, so if that’s what you’re looking for, you’re on your own.

In case you still doubt the fact that you have free will in general, let me inform you that you’re just retarded. You're not just wrong, you're willfully blind. You’ve just contradicted yourself by exercising free will.

Conspansive Duality: The Cosmic Pulse

The mechanism behind M=R is what Langan calls Conspansive Duality which describes an interplay between expansion (actualized reality) and contraction (potential states).

Referring back to the double-slit experiment, this mirrors the wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics but extends it to a cosmological scale, where reality is both discrete (localized) and continuous (distributed).

Discrete, because we can observe that at the smallest scale, reality comes in little packages, or, as we say, it is quantised. However, our experience of reality is continuous. It’s not like we experience the world through some sort of frame rate, but rather, as Eckhart Tolle would say, “It is always now“.

Expansion (Conspansion) represents the actualization of reality, like a cosmic computation. The unfolding of space, time, and matter, similar to the Big Bang but continuous. The Vedics call this the cosmic breath, where Maha-Visnu’s exhaling is associated with the creation and manifestation of the Brahmanda universes. In this case, the analogy between the CTMU, quantum mechanics, and Vedic cosmology is rather obvious.

"Conspansion is ontological compression: the universe ‘zooms in’ on itself to resolve states." (Langan)

It will get a bit more spicy in the next one, but we shall unpack even that.

Contraction (Potentialization) represents the collapse of possibilities back into a latent state, like quantum decoherence or perceptual resolution. This could at first glance represent two seemingly different concepts, namely Wavefunction Collapse and the Vedic concept of Cosmic Dissolution (Pralaya). Let me spoiler right away: it is both.

Option A: Contraction as Wavefunction Collapse (Illusion of Time)

If contraction represents the collapse of the wave function, then every observation collapses possibilities into a single moment. This means only through observation is the moment born. Therefore, observation creates the illusion of time. Time is an emergent artifact of this recursive contraction/expansion process (similar to Carlo Rovelli’s relational time in quantum gravity).

The CTMU says the universe resolves itself through perception, creating the appearance of time via conspansive feedback loops.

This mirrors the Maya of time. The illusion of linear succession in a fundamentally timeless reality, as in Advaita Vedanta.

Option B: Contraction as Cosmic Dissolution (Pralaya)

If contraction represents Pralaya, then the universe isn’t just locally collapsing, it is fully reabsorbing into potential. Imagine it like a black hole evaporating or Brahman withdrawing manifestation. In Vedic terms this is called the Night of Brahma, when the universe dissolves back into the unmanifest.

The CTMU would say the Self-Configuring Language resets its state, recycling information into a new cycle of expansion.

Synthesis

This means conspansive duality operates at both micro (quantum) and macro (cosmic) scales.

On a quantum level, contraction is wavefunction collapse, creating time as we experience it. On a cosmic level, contraction is universal potentialization, like a big crunch or return to singularity.

This mirrors Vedic fractal cosmology, where there is a day of Brahma (Kalpa) and a night of Brahma (Pralaya), but within each Kalpa, there are smaller cycles (Manvantaras), just as quantum collapses happen within the larger universe.

So whether contraction is quantum collapse or cosmic dissolution, the core idea is that time is not fundamental, it’s a side effect of conspansive processing.

Time is how SCSPL renders reality in a sequence of perceptual frames. This aligns the CTMU with Vedic cyclical time, quantum physics, and digital physics (universe as a self-resetting computation).

CTMU vs. Vedas

There is still a difference between Langan’s views and the Vedas, as in the CTMU feedback loops are recursive, not literal rebirth, as in the Vedas. Vedic cycles can be seen as metaphors for SCSPL’s state resets, however, the CTMU does not state literal cycles of reincarnation.

What does that mean? You tell me!

Anyway consciousness is fundamental and isn’t just a side effect of the material but rather the material and time itself are side effects of consciousness.

“Time is syntax masquerading as semantics” (Langan)

So what does it mean to fulfill your destiny? Fulfilling your destiny isn’t finding purpose, it’s debugging your state vector until it compiles.

If the concept of telic recursion naturally drives you towards your destiny but your free will still permits you to deviate, how do you measure the gap? By what metric do you judge your actions in any given moment if you can’t always see them in perspective to the greater goal?

Extrapolation requires computation so you can’t always think your actions through till the end. You simply don’t have enough time to do that for every single step of the recursion. If you want to know what is good and what isn’t, in any particular moment of crisis, you need to be able to answer that question instantaneously.

"A physical state is possible if and only if it satisfies the syntactic constraints of SCSPL." (Langan, 2002)

Now from your local point of reference, what is a point that can be reached instantaneously? Against what can you contrast yourself immediately?

Correct. Back into yourself. Coherence refers to a state of self-consistent, self-contained logical unity.

Reality has a built in debugging mechanism that will only allow coherent states. Since it is however not deterministic, you are allowed to explore the illusion of incoherence. Imagine a camera live fed to a screen and pointed at that screen. Your classic video feedback image.

If you wobble the camera in front of the screen, the image will never stop sinking into a hole. It will however curve in the early frames.

The camera’s wobble is your free will. The perceptual operator syntax of SCSPL that lets you edit reality’s self-rendering. The fractal’s inevitability is telic recursion’s attractor. You’re not choosing the dot’s path, you’re choosing how to wobble within the syntax.

You have some sort of control over the image but it fundamentally does what it does and you’re left with a sense of awe.

Recursion always happens stepwise and your free will represents the wobble of the camera. If you want to manipulate what is happening at the “deepest” frame, you do so by manipulating every single frame that comes in front of it. The recursive nature of the universe will save you time as all you have to do is align yourself with yourself, which is infinitely more easy than trying to figure out every possible state of the universe and judging them one by one.

This is M=R in action: your self-alignment IS the universe self-configuring.

Let’s explore the video feedback analogy even further.

Let’s say the blue center of the feedback loop happens to be in the center of the physical screen. The camera is pointed at the screen perfectly straight and centered. Now you want to move the blue dot to the top right corner.

How do you actually do that?

In order to move the last frame, that technically represents the center of the fractal, you will have to manipulate an infinite amount of frames in front of it. Do you actually calculate the change in position of the first frame and then from that the second and so on? Obviously you don’t since that would require an infinite amount of time and you would generate compounding errors.

Luckily the universe has a built in error-correction mechanism that is going to save you here.

"Telic recursion actively eliminates incoherent state transitions."
— CTMU Glossary ("Telic Recursion")

What you do is you lean into the recursion and exploit its own nature by directly understanding the relationship between the last frame and your degree of freedom, which is in this case the angle of the camera.

By carefully moving the camera in different directions, you learn how to manipulate one thing only, in order to let the universe manipulate an infinite amount of in-between frames for you.

You strive to achieve coherence within yourself and the universe around you will fall into place, the way its syntax permits.

You align yourself with yourself and thereby get closer to God.