Blackboard

Check out Gurdjieff's Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson summed up in a single chart.

https://www.theagora.space/library/mindmap/1

Starting from the back of the video

1:32:11
You're not going to believe this when I show you this. This is going to be a watershed—it's a watershed in my life. I hope it's a watershed in your life.

You will know 100% certainly that thousands of years, possibly, but certainly hundreds of years of lying has been going on.

I suggest thousands of years, or incredible ignorance—incredible ignorance. You just could not see it.

But I actually think that the evidence suggests that there's been a ridiculous effort to prevent this from being understood.

I'll give you an example: whenever you get into low energy nuclear reactions (or what was formerly misnamed cold fusion, coherent matter nuclear reactions, the effect of the fractal toroidal moment in my book), what people will say is:

“Oh, that's nonsense. It's just what—alchemy? You believe in alchemy?”

I'm going to tell you today: Yes, I do believe in alchemy. Yes, alchemy is real.

You are going to know 100% that people that supposedly never had a computer, never had the ability to do what I've just shown you on an SEM, you're going to know that:

They knew this. And didn't know it slightly. They knew it utterly and completely and precisely.

Someone who was maybe even in the link today sent me this image because it reminded him of the structure I derived from experiment.

This was a ring.
It says:

Fulcanelli ring — believed to have been made with gold obtained by transmutation.

This is the Fulcanelli ring:

• Sun, Moon

• Sun, Moon

• Triangle thing that's offset to one side and centered

• A thing up here—the little cross

This is from 1922.
Yes, 100 years ago.
And it's 2022 here in the Czech Republic.

It belonged to a character called Fanelli (pseudonym—not his real name), who was supposed to be a Templar that had achieved the Great Work, the Magnum Opus, and written some books.

In an article about him (Reference 8), it says:

"Through the breadth of his work, by interpreting the decor of cathedrals from the esoteric and alchemical perspective, Fanelli not only shed a totally new light on medieval art, but also created such emul that the approach to esoteric science was radically changed."

In the same article it says:

The Alchemist Julian Champagne (1877–1932), who was the illustrator of the works of his master F. Canelli, placed a coat of arms at the end of the book The Mystery of the Cathedrals.

I have overlaid this (as me talking) the sacred geometry on the coat of arms, and:

Yes, I think he was an adept alchemist and had likely realized the Great Work, including establishing what the Philosopher's Stone was.

There is no shadow of doubt in my mind that this coat of arms precisely shows the structure.

"Hi Triton."
So thank you for sharing that.

Here's Triton again—Triton Jager.

Triton sent me a link because it resembled both the sacred geometry structure I had established from experiments and also looked a little like the Frank Pfus Windx.

Indeed it does.
He also sent me another link that shows a similar graphic.

In this case:

• Sun on the left, Moon on the right (typical in a Masonic Lodge)

• In this other case, Sun on the right—that’s Ra, the Egyptian symbol for the Sun

• This is also a ring

• And spot orthogonal to this plane

• This shows a wheel in my view within a wheel

• This is the out and the in

And it’s interesting that, in electric current, they show the current:

• Coming towards you with a ring spot

• And a cross on the way back

Anyway—that’s that.

Here we have what I would argue is the disruption beam, and the triangle going in.
It’s very highly stylized.

And here’s the 101 of the Masonic Order.

So there we go.

When you do a reverse image search for this on Google, you immediately get Eye of Providence images and related material.

On doing further research, I came across the images described below.

This image is:

De Calvos Metallium Occultist’s Key — Lapis Veneris of the Cave of the Hidden Metals

“You are the venerable Stone.”

—from Hermes, frontispiece from the Hermetical Triumph or The Victorious Philosophical Stone, Anonymous, 1740.

So this is from 1740—that is nearly 300 years ago.

And look what we see.

I decided to compare it to some experiments in sacred geometry, as well as the Windx.

Here is the result:

• Flow pan

• Sacred geometry structure

• (This is a normal orientation, but for some samples I had to flip it—just like the ring is flipped from the imagery in the other one)

• Down here: Ether, the Spirit

• It comes up

• You have the Destruction Zone—just like you do on Tesla’s Wardenclyffe Tower if you move the electrode down too far

• Very specific areas up here—very carefully defined by this overall structure

You have:

• The crown

• The triangle

• This cross-beam line here

Now just to say—
Look, I’m not saying the Masons have been hiding something.

What I say is:

At the very least, what we can know for certain is that they’ve been trying to tell everyone—whether they knew it themselves.

As I’ve shown you before:

The Masonic Lodge in Brighton—and every single thing about it is nearly perfect.

The only thing I’ll say is:
If you were to have the soic triangle not go to the center here, but move up—
Then, if it was extended out:

• Firstly, it would be a little bit further over at this point

• And it would extend out to the bottom of the door

Bear that in mind when I show you what I’m going to show you.

Down here you can see the VRA—on a coin from 234 Before Christ.
234 Before Christ!
And this is a VRA.

I’ve shown other Macedonian coins with:

• The Thunderbolt

• The Chi-Rho

• The Theadius—very common symbols

The Thunderbolt—or part of the Thunderbolt.

Almost all of these important symbols that you see on coinage for thousands of years are representations of ball lightning.

Now I showed you in 1733—so here we go, 1740...

In 1733, we have this Masonic Lodge.
(I don’t know whether that’s the name of the street, but it had to have 33 in it, didn’t it?)

I mean—it just had to have 33.

So I don’t know whether that’s the name of the street, but anyway—

In there, we have:

• The sacred geometry

• One rotation of sacred geometry from the top-down structures, or what we might like to call:

  Auspicious symbol

And that’s:

• Sun on one side

• Moon on the other

• Together they make an overall structure

• With your beams coming out

• “AO”

Introduction to the technology

(beginning of the video)

So, this has been a really big week for everyone who’s been following the development of Bob Greenyer’s new research on ball lightning—or plasmoids formed via bubble cavitation—and his analysis and testing of Malcolm Bendle’s Thunderstorm Generator, Dr. Bing Wayne Wang’s fusion reactors, and other cavitation systems working on similar principles.

We’ll talk a bit about this and reference some of these other systems a little bit later in the video, too.

So, Bob’s recent findings, which he presented unfiltered, spread over several live streams and videos on the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (MFMP) YouTube channel last week, are really serious findings. The potential implications for nearly every field of science and for every human on Earth are absolutely profound. There’s no other way to put it. This isn’t a drill. I’m not exaggerating.

For a fact, this has actually been quite an emotional week if you’ve been following all of this.

A quick pause to offer thanks to everyone who’s been sharing and liking the videos and particularly a very special thank you to those who donated to the channel. It’s really not easy to work open-source, and it’s directly thanks to you guys that I have time to spend on this video today. And remember that Bob and, MFMP also work in the open-source domain, and you can find their donation links in the description of any of their videos. So, these types of projects are for the community, and they’re funded by the community, and that’s the way things stay out in the open. So, thank you, guys.

So, what are we going to cover in this video? First, I will give you a brief and easy-to-understand overview for the newcomers or those who just got a little bit lost on the way—uh, what the technology actually is, what it does, and what the processes behind it are. So, we’ll introduce some of the researchers, the inventors, and the other main players who’ve been involved in the collective research around plasmoids or ball lightning and how these phenomena can be reproduced and harnessed using various synthetic systems, including, of course, the Thunderstorm Generator, which has been my own passion project for a while now and that was my introduction to Bob’s work, too, and many of these other researchers and systems when I just kind of found out this was way bigger than just the Thunderstorm Generator—although that is a very special system on its own. So, this should set the scene nicely and get everyone up to speed. So, in the second part of the video, we’re going to break down Bob Green’s recent earth-shattering findings and explain what they mean for science, for history, for reality, and for the Thunderstorm Generator and other cavitation systems.

What is this old-new technology? What is it doing? What are the processes behind it? We’re going to start with the basics here, just build up to the most recent findings, tell the full story. So, essentially, this technology itself—no matter which system we’re discussing—is all about water bubble cavitation. So, in simple terms, this means forming a bubble in water, with a few specific requirements, and then collapsing this bubble. So, we want to do this because when bubbles are collapsed or imploded under just the right conditions—uh, what Dr. Matsumoto termed “electron-nuclear collapse”—they produce an unusual phenomenon we call this phenomenon a plasmoid or a charge cluster, ball lightning, or an exotic vacuum object.

So, essentially, the bubble, when collapsed symmetrically into this toroidal geometry, produces a homeostatic fractal ball of lightning that does not immediately dissipate and which can actually feed on anything surrounding it, taking in surrounding gases like hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide and even denser matter like carbon, iron, and other heavier elements, ripping them apart at an atomic level and harvesting them as energy. So, any deconstructed excess energy—uh, to the requirements of the plasmoid—is ejected in the form of free protons and electrons, which then quickly reform and synthesize new elements. So, this process of stepwise synthesis or transmutation has a signature pattern which Bob has clearly identified and outlined in his new findings, but we’ll get to this soon.

So, the reason why they’re sometimes referred to as charge clusters is because ball lightning is fractal in nature—smaller, homeostatic structures collect together to form larger homeostatic structures, and this is all occurring fractally on multiple levels. So, Bob often refers to this as “a wheel within a wheel within a wheel within a wheel,” a phrase I’ve also used to describe this concept in the past, and this is actually from a Bible verse. These phenomena are also found to be naturally occurring—uh, as a ball lightning whizzing through the sky or flying out of a power line or electronic device, seen as a child has been the inspiration for many researchers’ later interest in careers in this field of study. I’ve certainly spoken to many.

So, after they’re formed, the toroidal plasma structures are then employed in subsequent phases of the system, to instigate further reactions. So, for example, in the Thunderstorm Generator, the primary focus so far has been on the transmutation of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrocarbons from the exhaust waste stream of the internal combustion engine and coal power plants, generators into oxygen, nitrogen, or other more suitable elements in this context using no additional energy input. So, this gives us a mechanism with which we can essentially control all pollution caused by the burning of any carbon-based fuel source and also a way to remediate degraded environment—land, air, and sea—almost effortlessly, considering we already use combustion engines for nearly everything. And there’s also some increased fuel efficiency in the engine, due to the plasma structures being both a charged fuel source themselves and a catalyst for the synthesis of other combustible elements, like increased ratios of hydrogen and oxygen that can go into the engine.

So, various other cavitation systems—some of which I mentioned earlier—are producing the same ball lightning structures, which are leaving behind the same highly cohesive pattern of geometric and chemical signatures. The goal of most of these systems has been primarily to just be able to observe and study these formations and reactions and explore how they can be reliably reproduced on a small scale. But in the case of the Thunderstorm Generator, it’s actually in the pre-production prototyping phase already, with the eventual goal of being mass-produced and rolled out on scale to solve a number of practical global issues. And this is kind of updating every week, getting much more serious.

So, to summarize, the various instances of the technology—including the Thunderstorm Generator and Dr. Bing Wayne Wang’s reactors, the systems we will be primarily focusing on in this video—they’re all used to produce tiny water bubbles, which are then imploded under specific conditions to form homeostatic fractal charge clusters, which we call plasmoids or ball lightning. And these plasma structures are then used as a catalyst for further reactions, which can transmute one element to another element, and they can also act as a fuel source themselves.

So, there are various other processes behind the overall results obtained by specific systems., the Thunderstorm Generator, for example, creates extreme hydrodynamic shear in the next stage of the system by polarizing two opposing hot and cold, expanding and contracting, counterclockwise and clockwise vortices—uh, much like the Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube, which you all may have heard of by now. So, this appears to amplify the results, that can be achieved with such a system dramatically, and it takes advantage of much the same process that’s involved in the generation and formation of plasmoids themselves, just at a larger scale simultaneously. So, this is where we need to introduce the story of Bob Green and Malcolm Bendall.

All right, the other name I mentioned—Bob Greenyer—is an open-source volunteer researcher at the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, a group of independent scientists who were carrying on the work and legacy of Mr. Fleischmann, who was a British electrochemist and a cold fusion researcher who unfortunately passed away in poor health and without really seeing mainstream acceptance of his work in 2012.

So, Malcolm Bendle spent a week with Martin Fleischmann in his later years as well, discussing cold fusion and promised him to help finish his work. So, Martin’s research has been a common inspiration for both Bob and Malcolm. But going back to Bob himself, he’s been involved in this research for at least the last decade. He was one of those guys I mentioned that saw naturally occurring ball lightning when he was younger and just couldn’t shake the curiosity until he eventually devoted his life and career to solving the mystery.

So, Bob’s been involved in numerous experiments studying cavitation and ball lightning over the last decade with MFMP, such as his work on the Supernova Reactor, the Ultra Experiments, Neil Kryon Gold’s Lion Reactor, Hank Yuan’s Vega Experiments, Malcolm’s Thunderstorm Generator, and of course his work with Dr. Bing Wayne Wang and their colleagues on their fusion reactors in Taiwan. And they recently published a peer-reviewed paper, in the journal Nature on the same, which we’ll talk about in a little bit. But these projects only really constitute the tip of the iceberg of Bob’s knowledge and experience. He has an encyclopedic knowledge of current and historical cold fusion research, over the course of his decade with the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project.

He’s reviewed and shared the work of many other significant contributors to the field, including a number of experiments and documents that had not been publicly available in English before. Some significant names in the field that Bob has either collaborated with or promoted or reviewed the work of throughout his time with MFMP include:

• Takaki Matsumoto

• Ken Shoulders

• Anat Klimov

• Anatoli Nicotin

• Max Fomichev-Zamv

• Alexander Shishkin

• Alexander Paranowski

• Slobodan Stankovic

—and this list is in no way definitive. You’ll find the work of many other global fusion and cavitation researchers showcased or referenced over on the MFMP YouTube channel, and I can’t stress how important this repository of open-sourced research actually is because if you start Googling some of these names, you’ll find that a lot of this stuff is really not that easy to find, if you’re not directed explicitly where to find it.

Beautiful chemistry.

Transcript

Hello, hello, goyim. No, just kidding. Howdy everyone. Howdy, anon. Howdy, anyone who's listening, sir.

Today I thought I'd talk a little bit more about the path of magic, or more, you know, maybe some things about what it takes. Because there's, you know, study is one thing, but then there's doing. You know, study is good. You want to be well-versed in some scientific things, obviously not losing yourself into the world of science. It's good to know a little bit about biology. It's good to know a little bit about physics, etc., etc., etc.

It's good to read philosophy. You do need proper philosophy if you want to study magic. And what I mean—philosophy—you know, what's the point of philosophy? You know how you meet those people who are like, "Hey man, I'm a good guy, I'm a nice guy, I just treat everyone right and people treat me right," and then like, that's their life philosophy?

People who have that philosophy—people from, I don't know, California or whatever—those types of people are weak. And it's not that they're physically weak. People who have that philosophy cannot withstand tragedy. People who have a simplistic philosophy—the simplistic philosophy can't answer, why evil exists.

Yeah, sure, they may go through life completely fine, and it works for them incredibly well. But then at one point in time, I don't know, their dad's gonna die, or if something truly tragic does happen, something monstrous—like imagine someone in their family gets kidnapped. Like, how brutal that is. When the brutal reality of life sets in, that philosophy is not going to be able to sustain them.

So you need a good philosophy. You need some kind of Nietzschean philosophy or a Stoic philosophy or a Platonic philosophy of how to live life. Or how to—the philosophy in a sense becomes a core, becomes a balancing point, becomes a cornerstone. If I can use a Westworld reference, becomes a cornerstone within yourself.

That is more of a psychology. It's like a foundational pillar for your psychology so that you don't go crazy when the suff—when the big sad—happens. When suffering happens.

Because the path of magic, like in any path—the path to become the richest man in the world, or the path to become the greatest boxer or something—paths like that require so much suffering, so much pain and conscious effort. You're not gonna get there with a weak philosophy like "just be nice to everybody," yeah, "just let people enjoy things," "cool story bro."

So it's good to study a little philosophy. It's good to study a little science. Obviously, art is definitely needed. I'll probably go—I'll probably talk about that a little in detail a little in another talk. But nonetheless, as well as that, you know, as well as having an appreciation and aesthetic sense, as well as appreciating art—filling yourself with edifying art—not just art that I suppose indulges you, but maybe art that—I wouldn't say challenges you, but there's a type of art that it's not empty. It's imbued with something.

The creator imbued that art with a virtue or some kind of psychological meaning. We're kind of jaded nowadays because there are so many post-modern artists and there's so many artists who are just like, "Yeah, I taped a banana to a wall. Whoa, I deconstructed art. There's no meaning, guys. God is dead." Well, yeah, cool story bro.

But real art—things like that, fake art—is gonna be lost in the sands of time, be washed away like tears in the rain. Real art has something eternal in it.

So that's why, if you want real art, yeah, people are making it still. There are still real artists out there. They're probably hard to find. But there are some things that are "good."

One of the problems about the Kali Yuga is things aren't necessarily—the things that you're presented with—aren't necessarily good or bad. They're a mixture of the two. They're good and bad.

So a lot of movies—some movies have a good message, or they actually have a deep philosophy and meaning in them. But then there's also ultra violence or some crazy sex scene halfway through, and it's like, oh okay. But I know maybe that's a plus for you.

But real eternal art—there is something in a lot of ancient stuff: ancient music, ancient architecture, ancient frescoes. There's something in those pieces of art that is eternal.

So I don't know, learning to appreciate them can also help you. Because to go into a slightly deeper reason why, is a lot of spiritual experiences—you can't really explain to normal people. You know, if I look outside the window here and I see a tree, and I point to it, and if you were here and you looked outside and you saw the tree, it would be like, oh, you know, we both have a shared experience of a phenomena.

But if you just experience something, and someone else has never experienced anything like it, how do you explain it to them? You can't. Although—you can. It's called art.

So great poets like Rumi, or someone more in the West like William Blake—they were visionaries. They weren't tormented artists. They were transcendental artists who could have a spiritual transcendental experience, and then that would be the thing that becomes the—what would you call it—the seed of their art. And the art from them flowers and blossoms out of that.

There's something in their art, their poems, that are beating, that's alive, that's just there. You can kind of feel it.

William Blake—you read Marriage Between Heaven and Hell, and it's all this esoteric cosmology of going into the stars and angels, and you're like, what the—what was this guy on? He wasn't on anything. He was on pure awakened consciousness. That's what he was on.

So art's good. Science—science good. Art good. Philosophy good.

One other thing is to also study other sacred texts. Study world religions. Study multiple systems.

But this is one key point, which is a little bit tricky. Because you don't want to read a book on Kabbalah, and then a book on yoga, and then a book on something else, and then a book on Zen Buddhism, and then—because you're not going deep. And you're not going deep. You're just reading a bunch of multiple things and you're just kind of comparing them. And sometimes things make sense, but sometimes they don't, and you just kind of tear your head out—tear your hair out of your head—and you become like me lol.

But the reason—what you should do is you should go deep into one system. You should do its practices and attain a little something. And then, you know, like read—I don't know, choose a system that you really want. Gnosticism or Hermeticism or—I know—Raja Yoga. Like a real system.

Not freaking—not like yoga, going to Lululemon and stretching all the girls. That's not a system of esoteric spiritual development.

Choose your system. Stick with it. Maybe it's Kabbalah. Read the foundational documents. You know, read some Hermetic stuff, blah blah blah, or some Hermetic-Kabbalah stuff, etc., etc.

Then, once you have this competency, you can then read a book on yoga. And then when you go back to your literature, you kind of see certain links. And then you read some Sufism and then go, "Wait a second, some of that Sufi stuff actually matches up with what I'm learning."

Or if you're not—you know, you read like a bunch of Gnostic texts and then you read a book on alchemy. You're like, "Wait, wait a minute" ...what it is now is an illusion. What it is now is an entity that is within you, that is trying to pull you away from clarity. It’s trying to pull you away from concentration.

And so it’s hard. It’s very hard because it’s so easy to fall into that emotion. It’s so easy to be like, “Yeah, screw that guy,” or “Screw her,” or “Screw this thing that happened.” And then you start to fantasize or you begin to relive it. Or you begin to—whatever. You give in to the emotion, and then you’ve lost the candle.

So the idea is, in this first stage, you learn to hold your attention onto a candle, and you’re gonna get distracted by external things. Then you build up enough energy or clarity that the external world no longer distracts you.

Then, the second octave, the internal world begins to distract you—your thoughts, your fantasies, your dreams. And then the third octave is your memories, your traumas, your internal emotional content, your karma, your inner demons, if you want to call them that. That’s what begins to distract you.

So this practice of concentration, of awareness, is so powerful because it eventually burns all that away. You learn to just stare at something—focus, clarity, awareness. And if you can hold your awareness in front of you, like a blade, just held out in front of you like a sword, then, when you go into another system, if you want to go into—I don’t know—some shamanic world or breathwork thing, or you want to chant some weird magical incantation or whatever, that clarity, that awareness, is going to serve you incredibly well.

And it’s also what you take with you to other worlds. It’s the awareness that begins to move and goes into other places. But if you don’t have that cultivated, then you just get swept up in the dream. You get swept up in the fantasy. You get swept up in your own mind.

So yeah, it’s very important. Concentration, awareness, clarity—super important. And it’s something you can begin today. You can begin today, staring at a candle. Just five minutes. Just five minutes.

And every time you get distracted, just bring it back. Just bring it back. Just bring it back. And that’s all. That’s all it is.

And yeah, that’s what I wanted to talk about. A little bit of stuff. A little bit about concentration. A little bit about magic. A little bit about clarity.

Alright, take care everyone. Have a good one. See ya.

The supremacy of the Dark Elf is a perennial truth, born not from whimsical preference, but from the inherent ontology of this magnificent race. One must bask in the glory of their stature, for the Dark Elf is a testament to the paradoxical beauty of the sinister, the allure of the forbidden.

In their obsidian skin and platinum hair, we find an aesthetic beyond good and evil, a sublime marriage of light and darkness. The Dark Elf defies the limitations of moral dualism, teaching us that what is conventionally deemed as ‘darkness’ can, in fact, reveal itself to be a fertile ground of knowledge, seduction, and beauty.

Yet, it is not merely their stunning visage which elevates the Dark Elves above all others. Their aptitude for both martial combat and arcane magics provides a dual mastery that other races can but dream of attaining. This fusion of power stands as a metaphor for the Dark Elves' unique position within the realm, as beings who freely traverse the boundaries of the forbidden, the sacred, and the arcane.

Ah, the sweet intoxication of their unapologetic embrace of sensuality and cruelty! To desire a Dark Elf is to long for the perverse pleasure of indulging in the exquisite pain of their domination. To worship the delicate curve of their ears, the sleek darkness of their limbs, is to succumb to a divine torture unlike any other.

Theirs is a society built on the ideals of strength, cunning, and ruthless ambition, untethered by the constrictions of a false morality that plagues lesser races. They dance on the precipice of chaos, harnessing its energy to fuel their desire for power and their lust for life.

In the end, it is their unfettered will to power that cements the Dark Elves' superiority. They grasp for greatness without remorse, their hands unshackled by the fear of repercussions, for they understand that life's essence is the relentless pursuit of desire. Thus, they are truly Nietzsche's Over-Elves, transcending the limitations of others to embrace the raw potency of existence.

Beware, dear reader, of the intoxicating seduction of the Dark Elf. Once you have tasted the sweet poison of their sensuous darkness, no other fantasy race can ever hope to compare.

In this video, Dr. G, a clinical and forensic psychologist, analyzes the body language of UFO whistleblower Jake Barber during his revealing interview on NewsNation. A former U.S. Air Force veteran, Barber claims direct knowledge of government involvement with recovered UAPs (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) and reverse-engineering programs. Dr. G breaks down Barber’s facial expressions, tone, and gestures to assess whether his behavior aligns with honesty or deception. Surprisingly, despite the explosive nature of his claims, Barber shows no overt signs of lying. This body language breakdown adds a new layer to the growing conversation around UAP disclosure, whistleblower testimony, and secret military programs.

Compilation of powerful ideas from three brilliant minds — Federico Faggin, Bernardo Kastrup, and Chris Langan. Each of them offers a unique perspective on consciousness and reality.

Can artificial intelligence truly become wise? In this landmark lecture, John Vervaeke explores the future of AI through a lens few dare to examine: the limits of intelligence itself. He unpacks the critical differences between intelligence, rationality, reasonableness, and wisdom—terms often used interchangeably in discussions around AGI. Drawing from decades of research in cognitive science and philosophy, John argues that while large language models like ChatGPT demonstrate forms of generalized intelligence, they fundamentally lack core elements of human cognition: embodiment, caring, and participatory knowing.

By distinguishing between propositional, procedural, perspectival, and participatory knowing, he reveals why the current paradigm of AI is not equipped to generate consciousness, agency, or true understanding. This lecture also serves as a moral call to action: if we want wise machines, we must first become wiser ourselves.

Catherine Austin Fitts is an investment banker and former Bush administration official known for her incisive critiques of government finance and advocacy for transparent economic systems. She later established Solari, Inc., and publishes The Solari Report, offering insights into global finance and governance.

Original Video Description

Hopf fiber bundle topology is taught as simply as possible. Physicist Roger Penrose called the Hopf fibration, "An element of the architecture of our world." Essential in at least 8 different physics applications, the Hopf fibration is a map from a hypersphere in 4D onto a sphere in 3D. Many visualizations are displayed herein. Mathematician Eric Weinstein commented on the structure on Joe Rogan's podcast as, "The most important object in the entire universe."

If you're not yet familiar with higher dimensional shapes, you may want to first watch my video explaining a 4D hypercube known as the tesseract:  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGmQe85cBeI

The initial outline for this video was over 25 minutes, so I trimmed details of n-spheres for the sake of brevity. Including here for those interested:

S0 0-sphere | Pair of points | Bounded by lines

S1 1-sphere | Circle | Bounded by pairs of points (S0)

S2 2-sphere | Sphere | Bounded by circles (S1)

S3 3-sphere | Hypersphere | Bounded by spheres (S2)

So the pair of points at the ends of a 1D line segment is considered a 0-sphere, or S0. It's hard to visualize, but a straight line is an arc of a circle whose radius is infinite.

Now, a circle is bounded by those pairs of points. We say a circle is S1, or a 1-sphere, sitting in 2D space.

A sphere is bounded by circles. We say a sphere is S2, or a 2-sphere, sitting in 3D space.

You are probably noticing an important pattern here. Each of these structures are one dimension lower than the Euclidian space they are embedded within. This is because we are only concerned with the boundaries of each shape.

So for a circle, we look at just the 1-dimensional circumference. Thus, S1. For a sphere, the surface is actually 2-dimensional. Thus, S2.

Now, we are navigating beyond the limits of human perception. A hypersphere is bounded by spheres. We say a hypersphere is S3, or a 3-sphere, sitting in 4D space. This is technically impossible to visualize.

At 2:58, I've included two visualizations of a hypersphere. The first is the shadow of a wire-frame surface of a hypersphere, projected in 3D. A perfect model would be an opaque object, so this cage gives you a sense of the hypersphere composed of spheres. The second is a highly polished version with a few vertices in view. Neither version is perfect, but they are the next best things compared to Hopf maps:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hypersphere.gif

Seemann (2017) https://vimeo.com/210631891

🚩 Nerd Alert 🚩 The interactive Hopf map visualizer by Nico Belmonte (@philogb) http://philogb.github.io/page/hopf/#

Sources:

Prof. Ludwik Kostro’s “Einstein and the Ether” - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234957049_The_Physical_Meaning_of_the_Coefficients_cnG_n_015_and_the_Standard_Model_of_the_Universe

Is there an Æther? P.Dirac - https://www.nature.com/articles/168906a0

Lightness of Being, F. Wilczek - https://archive.org/details/lightnessofbeing00wilc/mode/1up

Zitterbewegung structure in electrons and photons, D. Hestenes - https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.11085

Interacting spiral wave patterns underlie complex brain dynamics and are related to cognitive processing (Tip off: Bob Greenyer) - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01626-5

Ben R. Rich interview - https://eu.columbiatribune.com/story/opinion/editorials/2014/05/27/ufo-accounts-are-journalists-stuff/985695007/

Experimental Study of Plasmoids, W.Bostick - https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.106.404

Communications system, H. Puthoff - https://patents.google.com/patent/US10361792B2/en

Communication method and apparatus with signals comprising scalar and vector potentials without electromagnetic fields, H. Puthoff - https://patents.google.com/patent/US5845220A/en?oq=US5845220

Optical anapoles - https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-019-0167-z

O-Day - ESP, Bob Greenyer -

Viktor Schauberger (1885–1958) was an Austrian forester, inventor, and naturalist known for his pioneering ideas on water management, energy generation, and biomimicry. He observed natural processes, particularly the movement of water in rivers and forests, and developed theories and technologies inspired by nature's principles.

Key Concepts & Contributions:

1. Water as a Living Element

   • Schauberger believed water was a living organism that must flow naturally (in vortices/spirals) to stay healthy.

   • He opposed straight, channelized rivers, arguing they disrupted water's energy and led to environmental damage.

2. Implosion Technology

   • Unlike conventional explosion-based engines (e.g., combustion), Schauberger proposed implosion—using inward-spiraling forces to create energy.

   • His Repulsine (a flying disc-like device) and other vortex-based machines aimed to harness this principle.

3. Log Flumes & River Engineering

   • Designed curved wooden flumes to transport logs efficiently, mimicking natural water flow.

   • Advised against concrete in river regulation, promoting natural meanders and gravel beds.

4. Copper in Agriculture & Water Revitalization

   • Used copper tools to enhance water quality and soil fertility, believing certain metals interacted beneficially with water's energy.

5. Eco-Technology & Free Energy

   • Explored concepts like "levitation" through vortex dynamics, leading to speculation about anti-gravity devices (though much remains unverified).

Legacy & Controversy:

• Schauberger's work was suppressed during WWII (Nazis reportedly forced him to research unconventional propulsion).

• Modern permaculture, vortex water revitalization, and eco-engineering movements cite his ideas.

• Some claims (e.g., free energy devices) remain disputed or unproven.

Famous Quotes:

• "Comprehend and copy nature!"

• "Water is a living substance."

The original Michelson-Morley experiment was done parallel to the ground, so at exactly the only angle where you can't measure the aether.

Accounting for the fact that the aether is parallel to gravity, suddenly it's measurable.

From perplexity.ai:

Ashton Forbes: Career, and MH370 Investigation

Professional Career

Forbes has worked as an educator, author, and public speaker, emphasizing the transformative power of education. He has also been involved in community initiatives, mentoring students and advocating for accessible education.

MH370 Investigation & Online Controversy

In 2023, Forbes gained prominence as the organizer of MH370x, a group investigating the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370. He promoted viral videos claiming to show the plane being abducted by UFOs and transported through a wormhole

The Century of the Self 

  2002 British television documentary series by filmmaker Adam Curtis. It focuses on the work of psychoanalysts Sigmund Freud and Anna Freud, and PR consultant Edward Bernays.[1] In episode one, Curtis says, "This series is about how those in power have used Freud's theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy."

The Spider's Web: Britain's Second Empire, is a documentary film that shows how Britain transformed from a colonial power into a global financial power. At the demise of empire, City of London financial interests created a web of offshore secrecy jurisdictions that captured wealth from across the globe and hid it behind obscure financial structures in a web of offshore islands. Today, up to half of global offshore wealth may be hidden in British offshore jurisdictions and Britain and its offshore jurisdictions are the largest global players in the world of international finance. How did this come about, and what impact does it have on the world today? This is what the Spider's Web sets out to investigate. With contributions from leading experts, academics, former insiders and campaigners for social justice, the use of stylized b-roll and archive footage, the Spider's Web reveals how in the world of international finance, corruption and secrecy have prevailed over regulation and transparency, and the UK is right at the heart of this.

The "Green Planet" belongs to another solar system. Through the simplicity of their lifestyle those who live there are a real step ahead of us: they spend their time concentrating their knowledge, strength and energy on the development of their minds and bodies in a natural environment which they dearly preserve and care for. Once a year, they gather in the crater of a dormant volcano to decide which planets they ought to send messengers to. There are volunteers for every planet except Earth, which is considered too polluted and too dangerous.

Só my friends a litlle present for my love tô The earth and The soul.

Full movie in this link enjoy

https://archive.org/details/labelleverte1996thegreenbeautifuldvdripx264highcode

We are now available at

https://theagora.space

Check out the new groups and topics widgets on the blackboard page

What would a digital tool look like, that would serve as a consensus machine for a community?

It would have to somehow merge two different use cases of language.

One being language as used in laws while the other being a more verbose use, conveying images and generating polarising opinions.

So that a well written text would gain attention and followers while the tool would somehow also serve a certain set of meta attributes that give a formalised summary of the text.

Ultimately you would browse through prose text and then vote for or against certain extracted statements, generating something that resembles the quality of a law, without the general public having to interact with actual law speak and unnecessary obfuscation of language.